Comparative Analysis of Network Quality Using QOS Parameters on Mikrotik Routers Using the Queue Tree and Simple Queue Methods
Abstract
The research was conducted by researchers at Trienggadeng State Vocational School located on Jl Banda Aceh-Medan KM 152, Kec. Trienggadeng Regency. Pidie Jaya. This research is based on the importance of the network in the ongoing teaching and learning process in the network and computer labs, the network in the lab is currently not managed properly and the distribution of bandwidth is not evenly distributed. To get a good internet connection, it is necessary to distribute bandwidth evenly, which can be done using a proxy router. One of the features for distributing bandwidth evenly in the proxy router can be applied using the simple queue and queue tree methods, knowing network quality can be done using Quality of Service (QoS) measurements. This study aims to determine the analysis of network quality using Qos on proxy routers using the simple queue and queue tree methods. The method used in this study is to use the action research method (action research), the stages of the research are analyzing, data collection, data completeness, making network designs, and taking action. The results obtained for network analysis in a comparative study between simple queue and queue tree networks, the results for the delay obtained by the queue tree are 9 ms, packet loss = 0%, and throughput = 549 k. Whereas the simple queue obtains the value from the QoS measurement by performing calculations with the equation formula to obtain a value of delay = 8 ms, packet loss = 0.15% and throughput = 629 k. Based on the Tiphon standard, it can be concluded that for delay, a queue tree is better with a value above the simple queue with a very good index, the packet loss queue tree is better than the simple queue, the index is very good, the throughput of the simple queue is better compared to the throughput queue tree. This research shows that overall Queue Tree is more optimal for QoS.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Hafiz and D. Susianto, “Analysis of Internet Service Quality Using Internet Control Message Protocol,†in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1338, no. 1, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012055.
M. M. Rahman Redoy Akanda and M. A. Hossain, “Smart-devices in Human Behavior Manipula-tion: Process diagram with exploratory assessment,†Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v1i3.88.
Z. Naor, “LAMA/CA: A load-adaptive MAC protocol for short packets,†Mob. Networks Appl., vol. 15, no. 5, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11036-009-0197-y.
P. Barbaro et al., “Safety Data Sheet,†J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, doi: 10.1021/jm701266y.
M. Rusdan and A. R. Riswaya, “User Authentication Jaringan Nirkabel Berbasis Web Menggunakan Radius Di Universitas Bale Bandung ( Unibba ),†J. Comput. Bisnis, vol. 12, no. 2, 2018.
E. M. Sipayung, C. Fiarni, and E. Aditya, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Helpdesk Menggunakan Framework ITIL V3,†J. Nas. Tek. Elektro dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 6, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.22146/jnteti.v6i2.308.
A. R. Darlis, “Perancangan dan Realisasi Sistem Remote Tilting Antenna untuk aplikasi Base Transceiver Station (BTS),†ELKOMIKA Itenas, 2013.
P. Aimtongkham, P. Horkaew, and C. So-In, “An Enhanced CoAP Scheme Using Fuzzy Logic with Adaptive Timeout for IoT Congestion Control,†IEEE Access, vol. 9, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072625.
S. Mostafavi, V. Hakami, and M. Sanaei, “Quality of service provisioning in network function virtualization: a survey,†Computing, vol. 103, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00607-021-00925-x.
O. O. Olayinka, S. O. Olukemi, and O. Chukwuemeka, “Assessment of Quality of Service of Mobile Network Operators in Akure,†Int. J. Bus. Adm., vol. 10, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.5430/ijba.v10n3p118.
M. F. Rohmah, “Perbandingan Performance Managemen Bandwidth Metode Hierarchical Token Bucket ( Htb) Dan Per Connection Queue Menggunakan Mikrotik Rb450G,†Snp2M.Unim.Ac.Id, no. January, 2020.
M. E. Mahmud and S. Suratman, “Evaluasi Program Manajemen Pembelajaran Pada Sekolah Adiwiyata Kalimantan Timur,†Al-Tanzim J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–96, 2019, doi: 10.33650/al-tanzim.v3i2.691.
D. Abdullah, R. Rahim, D. Hartama, A. Abdisyah, Z. Zulmiardi, and S. Efendi, “Application of Web Based Book Calculation using Deterministic Dynamic Programming Algorithm,†2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1019/1/012040.
T. Mantoro and A. Zakariya, “Securing E-Mail Communication Using Hybrid Cryptosystem on Android-based Mobile Devices,†TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., 2015, doi: 10.12928/telkomnika.v10i4.870.
M. Ula, R. Tjut Adek, and B. Bustami, “Emarketplace Performance Analysis Using PIECES Method,†Int. J. Eng. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 4, 2021, doi: 10.52088/ijesty.v1i4.138.
V. R. Jain, R. Bagree, A. Kumar, and P. Ranjan, “wildCENSE: GPS based animal tracking system,†2008, doi: 10.1109/ISSNIP.2008.4762058.
M. A. Khan et al., “An Efficient and Secure Certificate-Based Access Control and Key Agreement Scheme for Flying Ad-Hoc Networks,†IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3055895.
C. Amali and B. Ramachandran, “Enabling Key Technologies and Emerging Research Challenges Ahead of 5G Networks: An Extensive Survey,†JOIV Int. J. Informatics Vis., 2018, doi: 10.30630/joiv.2.3.128.
T. I. Naibaho and U. I. M. Hanafiah, “ANALISA SIRKULASI RUANG GERAK PENGGUNA PADA AREA BACA DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS SWASTA Studi kasus: Perpustakaan Learning Center, Telkom University dan Perpustakaan Universitas Parahyangan,†Idealog Ide dan Dialog Desain Indones., 2017, doi: 10.25124/idealog.v1i3.979.
K. Shafique, B. A. Khawaja, F. Sabir, S. Qazi, and M. Mustaqim, “Internet of things (IoT) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5G-IoT Scenarios,†IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 23022–23040, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970118.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/jaiem.v1i1.12
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
