Community and Stakeholder Participation in the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility Programs, Its Impact on Rural Communities
Abstract
Empowerment is a pathway to participation, and participation determines the impact of community development programs socially and economically. In general, this study aims to identify the relationship between the level of community and stakeholder participation in implementing the Geothermal Agency's Corporate Social Responsibility Program through Microfinance Institutions and its impact on the socioeconomic conditions of the community. XYZ District-Based Microfinance Program partnering with LKMS. The subjects of this study were the people of XY Village, including local government and local communities, and company staff. The method applied in this research consists of quantitative and qualitative studies. With nine informants, fifty-five respondents were taken as samples representing the XY Village community. The results of this study indicate that each stakeholder has a different type and level of participation. The higher the story of the involvement of microfinance board members in each stage of program implementation, the higher the social and economic impact will be.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
E. Escrig-Olmedo, M. ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo, I. Ferrero-Ferrero, J. M. Rivera-Lirio, and M. J. Muñoz-Torres, “Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles,†Sustain., vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, DOI: 10.3390/su11030915.
H. Adobor and R. S. McMullen, “Supply chain resilience: a dynamic and multidimensional approach,†Int. J. Logist. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1451–1471, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-04-2017-0093.
M. McAdam, C. Crowley, and R. T. Harrison, “‘To boldly go where no [man] has gone before’ - Institutional voids and the development of women’s digital entrepreneurship,†Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 146, pp. 912–922, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.051.
C. Wyborn et al., “Co-Producing Sustainability: Reordering the Governance of Science, Policy, and Practice,†Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 44, pp. 319–346, 2019, DOI: 10.1146/annual-environ-101718-033103.
M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “The Big idea Creating Shared Value how to reinvent capitalism-and unleash a wave of innovation and growth,†Creat. Share. Value, no. February, pp. 2–17, 2019.
W. L. Tate and L. Bals, “Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the Firm,†J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 803–826, 2018, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3344-y.
R. Bertani, “Geothermal power generation in the world 2010-2014 update report,†Geothermics, vol. 60, no. October, pp. 31–43, 2016, DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.11.003.
E. Trumpy and A. Manzella, “Geothopica and the interactive analysis and visualization of the updated Italian National Geothermal Database,†Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., vol. 54, pp. 28–37, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.09.004.
J. Bermejo Carbonell and R. A. Werner, “Does Foreign Direct Investment Generate Economic Growth? A New Empirical Approach Applied to Spain,†Econ. Geogr., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 425–456, 2018, DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1393312.
T. Mawela, N. M. Ohara, and H. Twinomurinzi, “E-government implementation: A reflection on South African municipalities,†South African Comput. J., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 147–171, 2017, doi: 10.18489/sacj.v29i1.444.
P. Mishra and G. B. Schmidt, “How can leaders of multinational organizations be ethical by contributing to corporate social responsibility initiatives? Guidelines and pitfalls for leaders trying to do good,†Bus. Horiz., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 833–843, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.07.011.
F. Darus, N. H. Ahmad Shukri, H. Yusoff, A. Ramli, M. Mohamed Zain, and N. A. Abu Bakar, “Empowering social responsibility of Islamic organizations through Waqf,†Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 42, pp. 959–965, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.030.
D. Kokotsaki, V. Menzies, and A. Wiggins, “Durham Research Online Woodlands,†Crit. Stud. Secure., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 210–222, 2014.
S. Kapoor, “Entrepreneurship for economic and social empowerment of women: A Case Study of Self Help Credit Program in Nithari Village, Noida, India,†Australas. Accounting, Bus. Finance. J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 123–142, 2019, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v13i2.8.
W. R. Ellis and W. H. Dietz, “A New Framework for Addressing Adverse Childhood and Community Experiences: The Building Community Resilience Model,†Acad. Pediatr., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. S86–S93, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.011.
U. S. Kesmodel, “Cross-sectional studies – what are they good for?,†Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 388–393, 2018, DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13331.
R. Hoffmann et al., “KiGGS Wave 2 cross-sectional study – participant acquisition, response rates, and representativeness,†J. Heal. Monit., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 78, 2018, DOI: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-032.
P. Muñoz and B. Cohen, “Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research: Taking Stock and looking ahead,†Bus. Strategy. Environ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 300–322, 2018, doi: 10.1002/bse.2000.
A. Alase, “The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach,†Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 9, 2017, doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9.
H. Atmowardoyo, “Research Methods in TEFL Studies: Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D,†J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 197, 2018, doi: 10.17507/jltr.0901.25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52088/jaiem.v1i1.4
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
